ext3 adds journaling filesystem capabilities to ext2fs.
| Tags | Filesystems Operating System Kernels Linux |
|---|---|
| Licenses | GPL |
| Operating Systems | POSIX Linux |


Release Notes: Speeding up MS_SYNC writes, setting up kjournald to be parented under init properly, ext3 is no longer experimental in config, fixes for i_blocks getting inconsistent after disk full, sped-up fsyncs in non-journaled data modes a little, no longer considering ENOSPC a fatal error when allocating an inode, a fix for an LVM snapshot deadlock, a fix for a "dump corrupts filesystems" core VFS bug, a fix for an over-zealous ext3 complaint about locked buffers, a fix for a very rare buffer leak, an O_SYNC fix, and a fix for a tiny race where a buffer could be written to disk too soon.


No changes have been submitted for this release.


Release Notes: There are no changes in this release; it's just a patch for a newer kernel.


Release Notes: Removal of much debug code, minimized core kernel changes, moving /proc/sys/fs/jbd-debug control up into jbd itself, and removal of i_truncate_sem in favour of leaving the orphaned pages on the inactive_dirty LRU rather than swapping them out.


Release Notes: Removal of compatibility ifdefs for old-style quotas, a fix for an oops in ext3_writepage(), and truncate can zero page->mapping after block_write_full_page().
12 Dec 2001 09:49
Re: 2.4.13 memory leaks
it is entirely possible that the leaks are specific to 2.4.13 or to my kernel config...but just the same there shouldnt be a leak at all, just felt like warning anyone with similar setups as mine...
(i only installed the 2.4.13 kernel at the time because it was the only 2.4 kernel patch i could find for ext3, and i need 2.4 for a number of reasons)
--Abaddon
>
> % havnt had the time to track down
> the
> % exact part of the code, but (at
> least on
> % my configuration) there is a huge
> memory
> % leak, it takes about 8k per
> % second...same config minus the patch
> and
> % no leak, im fairly sure this is a
> % problem with this patch...
> %
> % if you're using this patch just
> watch
> % out...ill see if i cant track down
> this
> % bug when i get some time....
>
>
> at the time of this posting 2.4.16 is
> the current
> kernel and ext3 is in the kernel src
> now without
> a patch. I haven't heard of massive
> mem leaks with the -current. I know
> people have their various reasons for
> running old kernels but 2.4.13
> wouldn't seem like a popular choice
> even so.
>
>
07 Dec 2001 16:21
Re: 2.4.13 memory leaks
> havnt had the time to track down the
> exact part of the code, but (at least on
> my configuration) there is a huge memory
> leak, it takes about 8k per
> second...same config minus the patch and
> no leak, im fairly sure this is a
> problem with this patch...
>
> if you're using this patch just watch
> out...ill see if i cant track down this
> bug when i get some time....
at the time of this posting 2.4.16 is the current
kernel and ext3 is in the kernel src now without
a patch. I haven't heard of massive mem leaks
with the -current. I know people have their
various reasons for running old kernels but 2.4.13
wouldn't seem like a popular choice even so.
07 Dec 2001 14:53
2.4.13 memory leaks
havnt had the time to track down the exact part of the code, but (at least on my configuration) there is a huge memory leak, it takes about 8k per second...same config minus the patch and no leak, im fairly sure this is a problem with this patch...
if you're using this patch just watch out...ill see if i cant track down this bug when i get some time....
04 Dec 2001 22:36
ext3 patches for 2.4
Seems they're now located at:
http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/
15 Aug 2001 06:06
ext3 merged into -ac kernels
Alan Cox's kernel tree now contains integrated ext3, as of linux-2.4.7-ac4.